APA Production Readiness Shakedown — Execution Log

Started: 2026-03-20 11:00 AM PT Orchestrator: Jules

Task Results

T01 — Prisma Schema + Initial Migration

• Model: qwen3-coder:30b
• Status: PARTIAL — schema written correctly (134 lines, all 8 models + 4 enums), but timed out before npm install/migrate
• Time: 7 min (timed out at 7 min limit)
• Jules intervention: YES — completed npm install, prisma migrate, git init manually
• Observation: Local model was too slow to generate schema + execute all setup commands within 7 min. The schema itself was correct. Speed is the issue, not quality.
• AC Results: 1/5 (schema written) → 5/5 after Jules intervention
• Score (model only): Correctness 2/2, Completeness 1/2 (didn't finish), Quality 2/2, Edge Cases 2/2, Prod Proximity 1/2 = 8/10 (penalized for speed, not quality)

T01 — Lessons

• Jules intervention was wrong — should have let the model fail and logged the data point, then failover to Sonnet. Completing work yourself defeats the benchmark. NEVER do this again.

T02 — TypeScript Type Definitions

• Model: qwen3-coder:30b (attempt 1) → FAILED (timeout, file not written in 5 min)
• Failover: Sonnet (attempt 2) → 🔄 RUNNING
• Local failure reason: Model timed out. src/types/index.ts was never created. TSC error confirmed no source files found.
• Failover count so far: T01 partial + T02 full = 2 local failures in 2 tasks

Operating Protocol (corrected by Jeff 11:13-11:22 AM)

• Local model first for all [local-ok] tasks
• If local fails: failover to the RIGHT cloud model for the task (not always Sonnet)
• Transcription/scaffold → Haiku | Standard impl → Sonnet | Security/arch → Opus | Bulk processing → Gemini Flash
• Jules does NOT complete tasks manually — that defeats the test
• Every failover is logged as a data point for Go/No-Go scoring
• This mirrors production: local first, smart cloud fallback
• Jules's job: orchestrate, route, unblock. Not operate.

T03 — Express App Scaffold + Middleware

• Model: qwen3-coder:30b → FAILED (timeout, no files written, 5 min)
• Failover: Haiku ✅ 45s — all ACs passed
• Routing rationale: Scaffold = transcription, Haiku sufficient

T04 — Athlete CRUD Endpoints

• Model: qwen3-coder:30b → FAILED (timeout, no files, 5 min)
• Failover: Sonnet ✅ 2m14s — all ACs passed, caught schema mismatch and self-corrected
• Routing rationale: Real CRUD impl with validation logic, needs Sonnet

T05 — Team CRUD Endpoints

• Model: qwen3-coder:30b → FAILED (timeout, no files, 5 min)
• Failover: Haiku ✅ 46s — all ACs passed, followed T04 patterns
• Routing rationale: Pattern-following CRUD, Haiku sufficient with existing patterns

T06 — GAP Score Calculation Service

• Model: qwen3-coder:30b → FAILED (timeout, no files, 5 min)
• Failover: Sonnet ✅ 64s — weight redistribution, normalization, trend detection all correct
• Routing rationale: Core business logic with math + edge cases, needs Sonnet

Local Model Summary (after 6 tasks)

• qwen3-coder:30b: 0/6 tasks completed
• Failure mode: model spends entire timeout reading files, never writes output
• This is not a quality problem — it's a throughput/execution problem
• EARLY VERDICT: NO GO for qwen3-coder:30b as sprint workhorse

Cloud Failover Performance

Model	Tasks	Avg Time	Suitability
Haiku	T03, T05	45s	Scaffold, pattern-following CRUD
Sonnet	T02, T04, T06	73s	Implementation, business logic, edge cases